1xBet Study Finds Only 20% of Players Use Responsible Gambling Tools – Education Emerges as Central Industry Focus

Key Takeaways

Industry Study Highlights Gap Between Tools and Usage

The global betting company 1xBet has published findings from its Player Protection Index Series, a study examining how operators approach responsible gambling and how players engage with available safeguards. The results indicate a significant gap between the tools offered by platforms and their actual use by players.

According to the study, only 20% of players actively use responsible gambling tools developed by operators. These tools include deposit limits, self exclusion mechanisms, and self assessment questionnaires. The findings suggest that low usage is not primarily linked to technical shortcomings, but to how such measures are perceived by players.

As online gambling has evolved over the past two decades into a complex ecosystem, game mechanics and betting options have become more sophisticated. Operators have introduced slots with intricate bonus systems and a wide range of sports betting types. This growing complexity has increased the barrier to understanding products, making user protection a central issue for the industry.

Operators Signal Willingness to Take Greater Responsibility

The study shows that 85.7% of surveyed operators are prepared to assume more responsibility in organizing safe gambling environments. In addition, 96% of respondents believe that close cooperation with regulators is necessary to achieve meaningful progress in player protection.

At the same time, 71% of operators say that players should also take responsibility for their own gambling behavior. This reflects a shared responsibility model, in which both platforms and users are expected to contribute to safer outcomes.

However, only 14% of respondents consider their current educational and awareness initiatives to be highly effective. This indicates that while many operators acknowledge the importance of player education, they see substantial room for improvement in execution and impact.

Perception Barriers Limit Effectiveness of Responsible Gambling Measures

The report identifies several reasons why existing tools are underused. Players in at risk categories often do not believe they need counseling support, self exclusion options, or other forms of assistance. Responsible gambling notifications are frequently perceived as restrictions rather than as mechanisms that expand user control.

Communication format also plays a role. Many users reportedly treat responsible gambling messages as advertising or spam, particularly when notifications appear at inappropriate moments during gameplay.

Operators themselves point to structural challenges. 67.6% of respondents cite a lack of player interest as the main barrier to advancing education initiatives. Meanwhile, 48.7% highlight commercial pressures that make sustained investment in educational programs difficult. Regulatory constraints are mentioned by 29.7% of operators, and 27% refer to general industry apathy as an obstacle.

Deposit Limits Lead Adoption, Self Exclusion Seen as Effective

Among specific tools, deposit limits are the most widely implemented measure. According to the study, 89.2% of operators use deposit limits as part of their responsible gambling framework. Self exclusion schemes are considered the most effective response when risk patterns in player behavior are detected, with 48.7% of respondents confirming their use.

Self assessment questionnaires receive a more cautious evaluation. 38% of operators state that such questionnaires rarely make a difference in influencing player behavior.

In addition, 70% of operators believe that players who follow safe betting principles tend to perform better over the long term. This suggests that many platforms see responsible gambling not only as a compliance requirement but as a factor linked to sustainable engagement.

Personalization and Real Time Interventions Gain Attention

The study points to a shift toward more personalized and integrated approaches. 60% of operators agree that player education is a key element of safe betting, and 84% consider it the foundation of safer gambling practices.

Operators in different regions are testing varied methods. In Africa, some companies reportedly contact players directly in real time after significant wins. In Latin America, operators increasingly rely on artificial intelligence to identify behavioral risk patterns more effectively.

The report also emphasizes the need to integrate educational elements into the full product journey, from onboarding to ongoing gameplay. This includes moving away from static fine print toward in game prompts and clearer explanations of gambling terminology such as RTP and RNG in markets where understanding may be limited.

Standardization of terminology and tools is identified as another priority. The findings indicate that consistent frameworks across operators and regulators could support more coherent implementation.

Our Assessment

The Player Protection Index Series highlights a measurable gap between the availability of responsible gambling tools and their actual use by players. While most operators report widespread adoption of measures such as deposit limits and express readiness to cooperate with regulators, they also acknowledge that current educational efforts have limited effectiveness.

For users of crypto betting platforms, sportsbooks, and online casinos, the findings underline that protective tools are commonly available but often depend on active engagement. The study frames player education, personalization, and closer regulatory collaboration as central elements in the industry’s ongoing efforts to strengthen safer gambling frameworks.

Hyperliquid Token HYPE Forms Bullish Pattern as a16z-Linked Wallet Accumulates $90.87 Million – ETF Launch and Institutional Signals Shape Market Focus

Key Takeaways

Technical Chart Pattern Signals Possible Move Toward Record Highs

Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE is currently forming a classic cup-and-handle pattern on its three-day chart. This technical structure typically consists of a rounded recovery followed by a short consolidation phase before a potential breakout.

In HYPE’s case, the cup developed after the price declined from around $46 to nearly $21. The token then recovered in a rounded formation back toward the $45-$47 range, which now acts as a resistance zone and neckline of the pattern.

As of Monday, HYPE was consolidating slightly lower, forming the handle portion of the structure. According to the chart setup described, a confirmed breakout above the $45-$47 neckline would imply a technical target in the $71-$72 range during 2026. That would represent approximately a 55% increase from current price levels and mark a new record high for the token.

For traders and platform users, such chart formations often influence short- and medium-term positioning, particularly when combined with on-chain activity and institutional developments.

a16z-Linked Wallet Accumulates $90.87 Million in HYPE

On-chain data has added further attention to HYPE’s price action. A wallet identified as 0xb5E4 and described by Lookonchain as linked to Silicon Valley venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, or a16z, has been accumulating the token since mid-April.

On Monday alone, the wallet purchased an additional 372,000 HYPE worth about $16.91 million within a three-hour window. Transaction records cited from Arkham Intelligence show that the total accumulation since April 14 has reached 2.11 million HYPE, valued at approximately $90.87 million.

Large purchases by venture-linked entities are closely monitored in crypto markets because they can affect circulating supply dynamics and market sentiment. In this case, the accumulation occurred while HYPE was testing a major resistance area near the neckline of its chart pattern.

The timing of the purchases has coincided with relative strength in HYPE compared to the broader market. Over a 24-hour period, the token gained roughly 7% while Bitcoin declined 1.22% and Ether fell 2.22%. On a year-to-date basis, HYPE was up 80%, compared with losses of nearly 12.5% for Bitcoin and 28.3% for Ether.

ETF Launch and Stablecoin Infrastructure Add Institutional Context

Beyond technical analysis and wallet activity, recent structural developments have positioned Hyperliquid within a broader institutional narrative.

Last week saw the launch of US spot HYPE exchange-traded funds, providing a regulated access vehicle for traditional investors. Spot ETFs allow market participants to gain exposure to an underlying asset without directly holding it, which can broaden participation from asset managers and other regulated entities.

In parallel, Coinbase and Circle have taken on roles related to USDC deployment within the Hyperliquid ecosystem. USDC is a widely used stablecoin in crypto trading infrastructure, and its integration can influence liquidity and settlement processes on decentralized platforms.

According to trader Pentoshi, Hyperliquid’s revenue could increase significantly if a compliant US regulatory framework such as the proposed CLARITY Act enables hedge funds, proprietary trading desks, and asset managers to trade on the platform. While this statement reflects a market participant’s view, it highlights the perceived link between regulatory clarity and institutional activity.

For users of crypto trading platforms and decentralized exchanges, such regulatory and infrastructure developments may affect liquidity conditions, trading volumes, and access pathways over time.

Market Performance in a Broader Crypto Context

HYPE’s recent performance stands out against a softer backdrop in major cryptocurrencies. During the latest 24-hour period referenced, Bitcoin and Ether both recorded declines, while HYPE posted gains.

On a year-to-date basis, the contrast is more pronounced. HYPE’s 80% increase compares with double-digit percentage declines in both Bitcoin and Ether over the same timeframe.

Relative strength against leading assets often draws attention from traders who rotate capital among altcoins based on momentum and structural developments. In this case, technical breakout potential, ETF access, and reported venture-linked accumulation have coincided with that relative outperformance.

Our Assessment

HYPE is currently positioned at a technical resistance zone defined by a cup-and-handle neckline between $45 and $47. A breakout above this level would imply a chart-based target near $71-$72.

At the same time, on-chain data shows that a wallet described as linked to Andreessen Horowitz has accumulated 2.11 million HYPE worth about $90.87 million since mid-April. Recent US spot ETF launches and the involvement of Coinbase and Circle in USDC deployment add institutional and infrastructure context to the token’s market narrative.

For market participants, the combination of technical structure, large-scale accumulation, and regulated access vehicles defines the current framework in which HYPE is being evaluated.

ICE and CME Urge US Regulators to Curb Hyperliquid Energy Derivatives – Scrutiny Grows Over Onchain Commodity Markets

Key Takeaways

ICE and CME Raise Concerns Over Energy-Linked Onchain Derivatives

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), the two largest exchanges for energy-linked commodities, are reportedly urging US regulators to restrict the activities of the decentralized exchange Hyperliquid in commodity markets.

According to a report citing unnamed sources familiar with the discussions, executives from ICE and CME have expressed concerns that Hyperliquid’s energy-linked onchain derivatives may create risks of insider trading and price manipulation. They also reportedly warned that the platform’s anonymous and unregulated structure could pose risks to critical energy markets such as oil and gas.

The exchanges are said to have argued that such markets could potentially be used by state actors to circumvent sanctions. The discussions highlight growing tensions between established commodity trading venues and blockchain-based derivatives platforms that enable permissionless market creation.

How Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 Framework Enables Market Creation

Hyperliquid introduced HIP-3, also known as Builder-Deployed Perpetuals, in January 2025. The feature allows any participant who stakes 500,000 HYPE tokens to deploy perpetual futures markets for any electronically traded asset class.

At current valuations cited in the report, staking 500,000 HYPE tokens represents a commitment of roughly $22.2 million. This requirement functions as the threshold for launching new markets on the platform.

Perpetual futures are derivatives contracts that do not expire, allowing traders to speculate on price movements without holding the underlying asset. Through HIP-3, these instruments can be created for a broad range of assets, including commodities traditionally traded on regulated exchanges.

Data from DeFiLlama shows that open interest for HIP-3 markets has continued to rise since launch, reaching more than $2.5 billion in May. Daily trading volumes for these markets have also been tracked publicly, indicating sustained activity on the platform.

The deployment model represents a shift from traditional exchange structures, where new derivatives products typically require regulatory approval and centralized oversight. In contrast, Hyperliquid’s framework allows market creation by token holders who meet the staking requirement.

HYPE Token Price Reaction Following HIP-3 Launch

The introduction of HIP-3 coincided with significant price movements in Hyperliquid’s native token, HYPE. Within three days of the feature’s launch, the token rose by more than 58 percent, climbing from around $20 to above $38. At the time referenced in the report, HYPE was trading at approximately $44.

Market participants have linked the price movement to expectations of increased trading activity and revenue associated with the new perpetual futures markets. Hyperliquid allocates 97 percent of its trading fee revenue to HYPE token buybacks, a mechanism designed to reduce circulating supply over time.

Crypto investor Arthur Hayes stated in March that HYPE could reach $150 per token by August, citing demand for commodities-linked onchain derivatives instruments. He also described Hyperliquid as the largest revenue-generating crypto project that is not a stablecoin, and characterized it as the dominant decentralized exchange for perpetual futures.

These statements reflect market commentary rather than regulatory assessments. The reported pressure from ICE and CME introduces an additional regulatory dimension that may influence how such products develop.

Regulatory Implications for Crypto Derivatives Users

For users of crypto derivatives platforms, the reported engagement between ICE, CME, and US regulators signals increased scrutiny of decentralized exchanges offering commodity-linked products.

Energy markets such as oil and gas are considered critical infrastructure within the global financial system. ICE and CME’s concerns center on whether decentralized platforms operating without traditional oversight could affect price formation or create avenues for market abuse.

Hyperliquid’s model allows for pseudonymous participation and permissionless market deployment, provided the staking threshold is met. This structure differs from regulated commodity exchanges, which operate under established compliance frameworks.

If US regulators respond to the concerns raised by ICE and CME, potential outcomes could include new guidance or enforcement actions affecting how decentralized exchanges list and operate commodity-linked derivatives. The report does not specify any concrete regulatory measures at this stage, but confirms that discussions are ongoing.

For traders and platforms that integrate or rely on decentralized perpetual futures markets, regulatory developments in this area could influence product availability, liquidity, and jurisdictional access.

Our Assessment

ICE and CME have reportedly approached US regulators to address risks they associate with Hyperliquid’s energy-linked onchain derivatives. Their concerns focus on insider trading, price manipulation, and the potential misuse of anonymous, unregulated markets.

Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 framework enables token holders staking 500,000 HYPE to create perpetual futures markets for electronically traded assets, including commodities. Open interest in these markets has exceeded $2.5 billion, and the HYPE token has appreciated significantly since the feature’s launch.

The situation illustrates increasing interaction between established commodity exchanges and decentralized derivatives platforms, with regulatory scrutiny emerging as trading volumes and market exposure expand.

Mubadala Increases BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Holdings to $566 Million – Sovereign Fund Extends Institutional Exposure to Regulated Crypto Product

Key Takeaways

Mubadala Expands Position in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust

Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund Mubadala Investment Company increased its holdings in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) during the first quarter of 2026. According to a 13F filing covering the period ending March 31, 2026, the fund reported ownership of 14,721,917 shares valued at $565,616,051.

This marks a 16 percent increase compared with the 12,702,323 shares disclosed at the end of the fourth quarter of 2025. The latest addition amounts to roughly 2 million shares over the previous quarter.

The filing confirms that Mubadala has maintained an uninterrupted accumulation strategy in IBIT since it first disclosed exposure to the product in late 2024. The sovereign investor has consistently added to its position through multiple reporting periods.

Accumulation Pattern Since Initial Bitcoin ETF Exposure

Mubadala first revealed a bitcoin related allocation in the fourth quarter of 2024, when it reported exposure worth at least $436 million. In the first quarter of 2025, the fund held 8,726,972 shares valued at approximately $408.5 million.

By December 31, 2025, the position had expanded to 12.7 million shares worth $630.6 million. That increase represented a 46 percent rise in share count within a single quarter.

The latest first quarter 2026 disclosure extends this pattern. With the new total surpassing $565 million in value, IBIT remains one of Mubadala’s most visible public market positions. As of the fourth quarter of 2024, IBIT was already the fund’s second largest holding, behind a longer term stake in Arm Holdings.

Mubadala manages a global portfolio exceeding $330 billion in assets. Its investments span technology, healthcare, infrastructure, private equity, and public markets. The mandate of the fund is to generate returns for the Abu Dhabi government while reducing reliance on oil revenues.

Abu Dhabi Entities Surpass $1 Billion in Combined IBIT Holdings

Mubadala’s exposure is complemented by additional bitcoin ETF holdings linked to Abu Dhabi. Al Warda Investments, an entity tied to the Abu Dhabi Investment Council and operating under the Mubadala umbrella, has also accumulated IBIT shares.

As of year end 2025, Al Warda Investments reported ownership of 8.2 million IBIT shares valued at approximately $408 million. When combined with Mubadala’s position at that time, total IBIT exposure across the two Abu Dhabi vehicles exceeded $1 billion as of December 31, 2025.

This combined allocation represents a notable level of participation by Gulf Cooperation Council sovereign entities in a regulated bitcoin investment vehicle. Both positions are held through BlackRock’s exchange traded fund structure rather than through direct bitcoin custody.

Broader Institutional and Governmental Activity Around IBIT

The first quarter 2026 filing from Mubadala was released during a period of continued institutional engagement with bitcoin related financial products.

Goldman Sachs disclosed approximately $2.36 billion in total crypto exposure through IBIT and other vehicles. Meanwhile, trading firm Jane Street reported holding 20.3 million IBIT shares worth $790 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2025.

On the governmental side, Texas became the first US state to purchase bitcoin for a strategic reserve during the same period. Separate financial disclosures also showed that the Trump family trust acquired shares in several bitcoin linked companies, including Coinbase, MARA Holdings, and Strategy, in the first quarter of 2026. Those filings indicated thousands of trades with an overall value between $220 million and $750 million.

Together, these disclosures illustrate the growing role of regulated exchange traded products such as IBIT in providing exposure to bitcoin within traditional financial reporting frameworks.

Implications for Market Transparency and Regulated Access

All of the above positions were revealed through mandatory filings, including 13F disclosures. These filings provide visibility into equity holdings of large institutional investment managers.

For market participants, including users who monitor crypto exposure among institutional investors, such filings offer insight into how sovereign funds, banks, and trading firms allocate capital to bitcoin related products. In the case of Mubadala, the steady quarterly increases demonstrate a consistent allocation strategy through a US listed exchange traded fund.

The use of IBIT as the chosen vehicle means exposure is gained through a regulated structure managed by BlackRock. This distinguishes it from direct bitcoin holdings and aligns the investment with standard reporting and custody frameworks applied to other publicly traded securities.

Our Assessment

The first quarter 2026 filing confirms that Mubadala increased its stake in BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust to $565.6 million, extending a multi quarter accumulation trend that began in late 2024. Together with Al Warda Investments, Abu Dhabi linked entities held more than $1 billion in IBIT shares at the end of 2025. The disclosures place Mubadala among a group of institutional and governmental investors that have publicly reported significant exposure to regulated bitcoin investment products through standard financial filings.

BloFin Opens Registration for WOW 2026 Trading Competition – $5 Million USDT Prize Pool Linked to Trading Volume

Key Takeaways

Registration Opens for BloFin WOW 2026 Grand Prix

BloFin has announced the start of registration for its 2026 WOW – War of Whales – Grand Prix, a global trading competition centered on crypto futures markets. The exchange confirmed that this year’s edition will feature a maximum total prize pool of up to 5,000,000 USDT, with the final amount determined by cumulative trading activity during the competition.

The WOW Grand Prix is structured as a seasonal event in which traders can participate either individually or as part of a team. According to the company, team leaders can now create squads, and participants are encouraged to register before the official trading window begins.

BloFin positions the event as a large scale competition among active traders on its platform, with rewards distributed across multiple categories tied to performance and volume metrics.

Prize Pool Structure and Distribution Model

The total prize pool for WOW 2026 is designed to increase as overall trading volume grows. It starts at a base tier and expands progressively until it reaches a maximum of 5,000,000 USDT. This structure links total community trading activity to the final reward amount.

Prize distribution is divided into four main categories:

– 40 percent allocated to the team competition ranked by trading volume.
– 20 percent allocated to the team competition ranked by profit and loss percentage.
– 25 percent allocated to the individual competition ranked by trading volume.
– 15 percent allocated to the individual competition ranked by profit and loss percentage.

In addition to these allocations, BloFin states that the top performing team will receive a headline luxury grand prize. Individual leaders across the rankings are also eligible for additional premium giveaways. Specific details of these non cash prizes were not disclosed in the announcement.

Four Competition Formats Including Human vs AI Segment

The WOW 2026 Grand Prix includes four main competition formats. The core component is a futures trading competition, where participants trade eligible contracts on the platform and compete based on volume and performance metrics.

Alongside the futures contest, BloFin has introduced three additional formats: a Treasure Box Prize Hunt, a Lucky Spin Draw, and a Grand Lotto Giveaway. These mechanisms are designed to provide supplementary reward opportunities during the competition period.

A notable addition in 2026 is the Human vs AI Showdown. In this segment, traders attempt to outperform AI driven benchmarks established by BloFin. Participants who exceed these benchmarks qualify for bonus prize tiers. The company describes this as the first time the event directly integrates algorithmic performance comparisons into its competitive structure.

This format places discretionary traders and algorithmic reference models in a measurable performance comparison. Results are assessed within the competition’s defined metrics, including trading volume and profit and loss percentage.

AI Enhanced PNL Card Introduced for 2026

BloFin has also announced an updated version of its WOW PNL Card for the 2026 edition. The PNL Card functions as a digital performance record for participants. It tracks individual trading statistics throughout the event and reflects results achieved in both standard competition categories and the Human vs AI segment.

According to the company, the 2026 version incorporates AI related performance data and is designed as a limited edition digital emblem tied to the event. Traders can use the card to display competition metrics and documented outcomes within the broader trading community.

The PNL Card builds on a similar feature introduced in the previous edition of the competition, with the 2026 version reflecting the new AI comparison component.

Platform Background and Trading Focus

BloFin describes itself as a cryptocurrency exchange specializing in futures trading. The platform offers more than 550 USDT margined perpetual pairs, as well as coin margined perpetual contracts, spot trading, copy trading, API access, unified account management, and sub account solutions.

The company states that it integrates Fireblocks and Chainalysis as part of its security and compliance framework. It also maintains partnerships with affiliates and participates in international industry events, including TOKEN2049, as part of its global outreach strategy.

The WOW Grand Prix is positioned within this broader product ecosystem, with futures trading activity forming the basis for most competition metrics and prize calculations.

Implications for Active Traders on the Platform

Because the total prize pool is directly linked to aggregate trading volume, participant activity plays a role in determining the final reward size. Traders who focus on volume based rankings compete not only on individual output but also within team structures that combine results.

The inclusion of profit and loss percentage categories means that performance efficiency, not just raw volume, influences final standings. The Human vs AI component adds a separate performance benchmark layer that may affect how some participants structure their strategies during the event.

Registration is currently open, and team formation is already underway ahead of the competition start.

Our Assessment

BloFin has launched registration for its 2026 WOW Grand Prix, introducing a scalable prize pool of up to 5,000,000 USDT and adding a Human vs AI competition layer. The event combines team and individual futures trading contests with additional prize mechanisms. Reward distribution is tied to trading volume and profit and loss performance, and the total payout depends on overall participant activity during the competition period.

ANJ Identifies 600,000 High-Risk Online Gamblers – Concentration of Revenue Triggers Regulatory Pressure in France

Key Takeaways

Algorithm Flags 600,000 High-Risk Players in Second Half of 2025

France’s gambling regulator, the Autorite Nationale des Jeux (ANJ), has identified approximately 600,000 online gamblers with a high probability of excessive gambling behavior during the second half of 2025. The assessment follows the launch of a new algorithm designed to detect at-risk and problem gambling patterns across licensed online operators.

According to the ANJ, the 600,000 flagged players account for 8.7% of the total online account-based gambling population in France. The data covers accounts held with licensed operators, including major businesses such as FDJ United and Pari-Mutuel Urbain.

The regulator described the tool as the first of its kind in Europe. It significantly expands the scope of detection compared to previous methods. Before the introduction of the algorithm, around 89,000 players had been identified as at risk. Under the new system, that number has increased to 600,000.

High-Risk Group Accounts for 60% of Online Gambling Revenue

Beyond the number of affected players, the ANJ highlighted the financial concentration linked to this group. The 600,000 identified players generated €1.2 billion in gross gaming revenue. This amount represents 60% of total online gambling GGR in France.

The regulator characterized this level of revenue concentration as concerning. It pointed to what it described as a dual upward trend: an increase in the number of problem gamblers and a simultaneous rise in their contribution to operator revenues.

For operators, this data establishes a measurable link between a relatively small segment of the player base and a majority share of online gambling revenue. The figures apply to the regulated online account-based market and include activity across licensed platforms.

300,000 Classified as “Manifestly Excessive” Gamblers

Within the broader group of 600,000 high-risk players, the ANJ identified approximately 300,000 individuals as “manifestly excessive” gamblers. According to the regulator, these players display behavior that makes their identification imperative for operators.

The classification indicates a level of gambling activity that, in the regulator’s view, is so clearly problematic that licensed companies are expected to detect and address it without delay. The ANJ stated that these cases require particular attention from operators in terms of monitoring and intervention.

This distinction between high probability of excessive gambling and manifestly excessive gambling suggests that the algorithm differentiates between varying levels of risk, rather than treating all flagged players as a uniform group.

Regulatory Expectations for Licensed Operators

The ANJ indicated that operators will face increased scrutiny following the publication of the findings. Licensed companies are expected to strengthen their ability to monitor customer behavior, identify excessive or pathological gambling patterns, and document the scale of such activity among registered players.

The regulator signaled that implementation of the new algorithm is part of a broader regulatory push. By encouraging or requiring operators to adopt the tool, the ANJ aims to standardize detection mechanisms across the licensed online market.

For operators such as FDJ United and Pari-Mutuel Urbain, which are specifically mentioned in connection with the account-based market, the findings increase compliance obligations. Companies will need to demonstrate that they can identify at-risk customers and respond in line with regulatory expectations.

Implications for the French Online Gambling Market

The data released by the ANJ provides a quantified view of risk distribution within France’s regulated online gambling sector. With 8.7% of the player base generating 60% of gross gaming revenue, the figures highlight a significant imbalance between player volume and revenue contribution.

The expansion from 89,000 previously identified at-risk players to 600,000 under the new system marks a structural change in how gambling behavior is measured and categorized. The use of an algorithmic tool enables the regulator to apply consistent criteria across operators and to assess the overall scale of high-risk activity within the licensed environment.

For users of online gambling services in France, the development signals closer monitoring of gambling patterns and potentially more frequent interventions when behavior is flagged as excessive. For operators, the findings increase regulatory accountability and formalize expectations around player protection.

Our Assessment

The ANJ’s new algorithm has identified 600,000 high-risk online gamblers in France, including 300,000 classified as manifestly excessive. This group represents 8.7% of the online account-based gambling population but accounts for 60% of total online gross gaming revenue, equal to €1.2 billion. The regulator expects licensed operators to implement the tool and strengthen monitoring and documentation of excessive gambling behavior, increasing regulatory oversight across the French online market.

SBC, IAGR and IMGL Launch Three-Year Regulatory Education Project – Expanded Focus on Compliance at Industry Events

Key Takeaways

Three Organizations Formalize Cooperation on Regulatory Education

SBC Events has entered into a formal agreement with two established bodies in the gaming regulatory space, the International Association of Gaming Regulators and the International Masters of Gaming Law. The agreement brings together an events and media company with a global regulators association and a professional organization focused on gaming law.

Under the terms of the tripartite agreement, the three groups will collaborate on regulatory education initiatives within the igaming sector. The cooperation is structured as a three-year project, indicating a medium term commitment rather than a one-off conference initiative or short-term content partnership.

SBC Events organizes business-to-business events and operates media platforms covering the gambling and betting industry. By partnering with IAGR and IMGL, the company signals that regulatory topics will take a more prominent role in its conferences and related programming from 2026 onward.

Stronger Regulatory Focus Across SBC Events in 2026

According to the announcement, SBC Events will have an even stronger focus on regulation in 2026. The agreement with IAGR and IMGL is positioned as a key element of that shift.

For industry participants, regulatory developments directly affect licensing, compliance requirements, operational models, and market access. By embedding regulatory education into its events, SBC is aligning its conference agenda more closely with the legal and compliance challenges that operators, suppliers, and other stakeholders face.

The collaboration suggests that future SBC events will include structured educational components developed in coordination with regulatory authorities and legal experts. While specific formats or program details have not been disclosed, the agreement establishes a framework for ongoing cooperation rather than isolated panel discussions.

Role of IAGR and IMGL in the Project

The International Association of Gaming Regulators represents gaming regulators from multiple jurisdictions. Its involvement indicates that public sector perspectives will be integrated into the educational content developed under the agreement.

The International Masters of Gaming Law is a professional association of gaming law practitioners. Its participation adds a legal dimension to the initiative, particularly in areas where statutory requirements, licensing frameworks, and enforcement practices shape market conditions.

By bringing together regulators and legal professionals with an event organizer, the project creates a structured channel for regulatory knowledge sharing within the igaming ecosystem. The three-year timeframe allows for continuity in programming and potentially for the development of recurring regulatory tracks across different events.

Implications for Operators and Industry Stakeholders

For operators and suppliers active in igaming, regulatory clarity and compliance readiness are core operational requirements. Changes in licensing rules, technical standards, or responsible gambling obligations can directly affect product offerings and payment options.

Educational initiatives that involve both regulators and legal experts can provide structured insight into how rules are interpreted and applied. While the agreement does not outline specific jurisdictions or policy areas, it establishes a mechanism for dialogue and information exchange within the context of industry gatherings.

For businesses evaluating market entry or expansion, regulatory education at major events can support due diligence processes. Conference sessions developed in collaboration with IAGR and IMGL may help attendees better understand the frameworks that govern online betting and gaming activities in different environments, though the precise scope of coverage has not been detailed.

Three-Year Structure Signals Long-Term Commitment

The decision to frame the initiative as a three-year project underscores a sustained approach to regulatory education rather than a temporary campaign. Multi-year cooperation allows for iterative development of content and for adjustments based on regulatory developments over time.

In an industry where rules can evolve and where cross-border operations raise complex compliance questions, a structured and ongoing educational program can provide continuity. The agreement does not specify performance metrics or milestones, but the defined duration indicates planning beyond a single event cycle.

For SBC Events, the partnership may also influence how regulatory themes are integrated into broader conference agendas, including keynote sessions, workshops, and specialized forums. However, the announcement focuses specifically on the collaboration and the enhanced regulatory emphasis beginning in 2026.

Our Assessment

The tripartite agreement between SBC Events, the International Association of Gaming Regulators, and the International Masters of Gaming Law establishes a three-year framework for regulatory education in the igaming sector. From 2026, SBC Events will increase its focus on regulation across its conferences. By combining an events platform with regulatory and legal expertise, the initiative formalizes cooperation on compliance-related content and embeds regulatory education more systematically into industry gatherings.

Prediction Markets Process Tens of Billions in Volume – iGaming Operators Confront a Distinct New User Base

Key Takeaways

Trading Volumes Show Rapid Growth in Prediction Markets

Prediction markets, long considered a niche segment, have recorded sharp increases in trading activity. According to the figures cited, Kalshi processed 43 billion dollars in trades in 2025 alone. Monthly volumes expanded from less than 100 million dollars at the beginning of 2024 to more than 20 billion dollars by early 2026.

Single event activity has also reached levels comparable to major sports betting days. On Super Bowl Sunday 2026, 871 million dollars moved through one prediction market platform within 24 hours. These figures indicate that the vertical has moved beyond experimental status and now operates at a scale that places it alongside established online betting segments.

Regulatory and infrastructure developments have accompanied this expansion. Gibraltar issued its first prediction market operator license, and business to business infrastructure providers have started to enter the space. This combination of licensing activity and service development suggests that parts of the regulated gambling ecosystem are beginning to integrate prediction style products into their planning.

User Demographics Differ from Traditional Sportsbook Profiles

Data referenced by Turbo Stars shows that prediction market users do not align with the standard sportsbook or casino customer profile. The core demographic falls into the 25 to 34 age group, skews male, and reports above average income and education levels. Around 26 percent hold graduate degrees, and 30 percent earn between 100,000 and 150,000 dollars annually.

This group is described as competitive, status conscious, and highly engaged with current affairs. Rather than focusing on team lineups or casino promotions, they follow news, macroeconomic developments, and geopolitical events. For these users, the surrounding information environment is central, and the platform functions primarily as a venue to act on their views.

Acquisition channels reflect this difference. Traffic to prediction markets comes mainly from news outlets, financial tools, and social media platforms. Traditional sportsbook affiliate networks or casino review sites play a lesser role. For operators, this means that established marketing funnels may not reach this audience effectively.

Higher Average Stakes and Concentrated Volume

Bet sizing and frequency also diverge from typical sportsbook patterns. The average prediction market bet stands at 185 dollars, compared to 55 dollars for a sportsbook wager. Engagement levels are correspondingly high. Around 21 percent of users trade daily, and another 29 percent trade several times per week.

At the same time, trading volume is heavily concentrated. Approximately 2 percent of users account for about 90 percent of total volume. This concentration resembles the high value player dynamic seen in casinos and sportsbooks, but the underlying profile differs. Instead of jackpot oriented high rollers, these users are characterized as individuals placing significant capital behind specific economic or geopolitical theses.

For operators evaluating entry into the segment, this concentration implies that a relatively small group of high frequency participants can drive a large share of revenue, while a broader base of occasional traders contributes lower volumes.

Limited Direct Cannibalization but Shifts in New User Growth

Leading sportsbook operators have publicly stated that prediction markets are not materially cannibalizing their existing business. The data cited indicates that only around 5 percent of legal sportsbook handle has shifted to prediction markets, suggesting limited direct substitution among current customers.

However, new user trends point to a structural change in acquisition. Between September 2025 and February 2026, the two largest sportsbook platforms saw new app installs decline by 13 to 18 percent year over year. During the same period, Kalshi added 6.3 million new users.

According to the analysis, prediction markets are attracting users who may not yet have engaged with traditional sportsbooks. Users active on both platforms reportedly underperform on each compared to single platform users, indicating limited overlap in core customer value.

For comparison platform users, this distinction matters. A prediction market account may not function as a direct substitute for a sportsbook account, and vice versa. The products differ in structure, event selection, and user motivation.

Implications for Product Design and Retention Models

The structural differences extend to product mechanics. Retention tools commonly used in sportsbooks, such as odds boosts, may not resonate with users who place larger stakes on macro or political outcomes. Engagement appears tied more closely to news cycles and real time developments than to traditional betting promotions.

As prediction markets move from peripheral experiments to formal roadmap items for operators, the focus has shifted toward understanding user behavior before integrating similar products. Turbo Stars reports that operators across multiple markets are assessing how to design acquisition and engagement strategies that match this specific audience profile.

The emphasis, according to the data cited, lies on observation and iteration. Operators considering entry into prediction markets must account for distinct acquisition channels, higher average stakes, concentrated volume distribution, and user motivations centered on information rather than entertainment alone.

Our Assessment

The figures presented show that prediction markets have reached substantial trading volumes and attracted millions of new users within a short timeframe. User demographics, acquisition channels, stake sizes, and volume concentration differ significantly from traditional sportsbook patterns. While direct cannibalization appears limited, shifts in new user growth indicate that prediction markets are engaging a separate and growing segment of the online wagering audience. For operators and comparison platform users, the data highlights structural differences between the two models rather than simple substitution.