American Bitcoin Surpasses 7,000 BTC in Corporate Reserves – Treasury Expansion Continues After Nasdaq Listing

Key Takeaways

Bitcoin Treasury Exceeds 7,000 BTC

American Bitcoin Corp. has expanded its corporate Bitcoin holdings to more than 7,000 BTC, according to company reporting cited on March 30, 2026. The increase continues the firm’s treasury growth following its Nasdaq listing in September 2025.

The company stated that its total Bitcoin reserves have nearly tripled since launch. It also reported that “satoshis per share” have more than doubled over the same period, indicating that the amount of Bitcoin backing each share has increased as holdings expanded.

With the latest update, ABTC ranks 16th among publicly traded companies holding Bitcoin on their balance sheets, based on data from bitcointreasuries.net. This places the company among a group of firms that use Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset rather than limiting exposure to operational needs.

Mining Expansion Drives Treasury Growth

ABTC attributes much of its treasury expansion to an aggressive build-out of its mining operations. During the current month, the company purchased more than 11,000 ASIC mining machines to increase its hashrate capacity.

Management outlined plans to scale the fleet to approximately 89,000 rigs, targeting around 28 EH/s in computing power. The strategy centers on self-mining Bitcoin at lower operational costs rather than relying primarily on open market purchases.

The company reported a mining margin of 53 percent, indicating that its mining operations remain profitable despite price volatility. At the end of last year, ABTC held 5,401 BTC. Since then, it has increased reserves above 6,000 BTC through a combination of mining output and acquisitions. Roughly one-third of its Bitcoin holdings came from mining activities, with the remainder acquired on the open market.

For users following the Bitcoin mining sector, these figures highlight the scale at which publicly traded firms continue to invest in infrastructure. Mining capacity, measured in rigs and exahashes per second, directly influences the amount of Bitcoin a company can generate internally.

Fourth Quarter Results Reflect Bitcoin Price Decline

The company’s recent financial results show the impact of Bitcoin market volatility on its balance sheet. In the fourth quarter, a 23 percent decline in Bitcoin’s price led to a $227 million non-cash mark-to-market loss. ABTC also reported a net loss of $59 million for the period.

Quarterly revenue reached $78.3 million, slightly below estimates but higher than the $64.2 million reported in the same quarter a year earlier. For the full year, revenue totaled $185.2 million.

Mark-to-market accounting requires companies holding digital assets to adjust the value of those holdings in line with market prices. When prices fall, firms record unrealized losses even if they do not sell the underlying assets. For investors and market participants, this accounting approach can significantly affect reported earnings during periods of price volatility.

Stock Performance and Liquidity Position

Since its Nasdaq debut in September 2025, ABTC shares have declined by more than 90 percent from peak levels. At the time of writing, the stock traded near $0.90 per share.

The company operates in a competitive environment that includes other publicly traded mining firms. According to the report, peers such as MARA and Riot are diversifying into artificial intelligence infrastructure. Hut 8, which supports American Bitcoin, has expanded credit facilities to $400 million and secured a $200 million revolving line from Two Prime, strengthening available liquidity.

These financing arrangements underline the capital-intensive nature of large-scale mining operations. Access to credit can influence a company’s ability to expand infrastructure, manage operational costs, and withstand price swings in Bitcoin.

Public Policy Commentary from Co-Founder

ABTC co-founder Eric Trump stated earlier this month on X that major U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo, are lobbying in Washington to restrict higher-yield crypto and stablecoin products. He referenced legislative efforts such as the CLARITY Act as part of this process.

The statement reflects ongoing debates in the United States about the regulatory framework for digital assets and stablecoins. While the company itself is focused on mining and treasury accumulation, regulatory developments may affect broader market conditions in which Bitcoin-related businesses operate.

Our Assessment

American Bitcoin Corp. has expanded its Bitcoin treasury beyond 7,000 BTC and increased mining capacity through substantial hardware purchases. At the same time, recent financial results show the effects of Bitcoin price volatility on reported earnings, and the company’s share price has declined significantly since its Nasdaq listing. The combination of treasury growth, infrastructure expansion, and market-driven financial fluctuations defines the company’s current position within the publicly traded Bitcoin mining sector.

SBC Webinar Addresses Rising US Gaming Regulation – Industry Faces Intensifying Compliance Demands

Key Takeaways

US Gaming Market Growth Meets Accelerating Regulation

The US gaming sector continues to expand, but regulatory developments are advancing at a similar pace. According to information published by SBC Americas, the current environment is defined by simultaneous market growth and intensifying scrutiny from regulators.

This dynamic affects a broad range of stakeholders. Traditional state regulated online sportsbooks and online casinos are directly impacted. At the same time, sweepstakes operators are also part of the regulatory conversation. As oversight increases, compliance requirements are becoming a central operational issue rather than a secondary consideration.

For operators, this means that expansion and product development must move in parallel with regulatory monitoring. The environment is no longer static. Instead, rules and enforcement practices are evolving in real time, requiring continuous attention from legal and compliance teams.

States Tighten Oversight and Step Up Enforcement

A key theme highlighted in the SBC coverage is the tightening of oversight at the state level. As individual states refine their regulatory frameworks, enforcement activity is also ramping up. This combination creates a more demanding compliance landscape for gaming companies.

Tighter oversight can involve closer examination of licensing conditions, operational conduct, and adherence to state specific rules. Increased enforcement signals that regulators are not only updating frameworks but are also actively monitoring whether companies meet their obligations.

For operators, this environment raises practical questions. How can internal processes keep pace with new or changing requirements? How can companies ensure that compliance is proactive rather than reactive? These are operational challenges that affect day to day business decisions, particularly in a fragmented regulatory system where requirements may differ across jurisdictions.

Compliance Pressure Extends Beyond Traditional Operators

The discussion is not limited to established state regulated sportsbooks and online casinos. Sweepstakes models are also referenced as part of the broader compliance debate. This indicates that regulatory attention is extending beyond the most traditional segments of the market.

For users of online gaming platforms, this broader scrutiny can influence platform availability, product structures, and operational transparency. When states increase enforcement, operators across different models must assess whether their offerings align with regulatory expectations.

From a market perspective, the inclusion of multiple business models in the compliance discussion suggests that regulators are reviewing the ecosystem as a whole. This may affect how companies design promotions, structure games, or manage user access, even if specific measures are not detailed in the source material.

SBC Webinar Focuses on Proactive Compliance Strategies

In response to these developments, SBC is hosting a webinar dedicated to the topic of US compliance and regulation. The central question posed is whether operators are prepared for rising scrutiny and how they can adopt a proactive approach to staying compliant.

The webinar format signals that regulatory change is now a strategic issue requiring structured discussion. Rather than treating compliance as a back office function, the conversation positions it as a core business priority.

A proactive approach, as framed in the coverage, implies ongoing monitoring of regulatory developments and early adaptation to new expectations. In a fast moving environment, waiting for enforcement action before adjusting policies may expose operators to heightened risk. The webinar aims to address how stakeholders can anticipate changes and build internal systems that respond efficiently.

Why This Matters for International Comparison Users

If you are evaluating crypto betting platforms, sportsbooks, or online casino providers, regulatory developments in the United States can have direct and indirect effects. Increased scrutiny can influence licensing status, market access, and the range of products available to users.

For platforms operating across multiple jurisdictions, regulatory pressure in one major market may lead to adjustments in compliance standards more broadly. Even if you are not located in the United States, changes in oversight practices can shape how companies manage risk and structure their operations globally.

For operators that accept crypto payments, heightened scrutiny in a large regulated market can also affect internal compliance controls. While the source material does not detail specific measures, the overall direction is clear: regulation is tightening, and enforcement activity is increasing.

Our Assessment

Based on the information provided by SBC Americas, the US gaming industry is entering a phase of intensified regulatory scrutiny marked by tighter state oversight and increased enforcement. This environment affects state regulated online sportsbooks, online casinos, and sweepstakes operators. The upcoming SBC webinar underscores that compliance is now a central strategic issue for industry stakeholders who must adapt to rapidly evolving regulatory expectations.

GLI Receives First International Accreditation in Ukraine – PlayCity Advances Digital Gaming Oversight Reform

Key Takeaways

PlayCity Grants First International Accreditation to GLI

Ukraine’s gaming regulator PlayCity has granted its first international accreditation to Gaming Laboratories International, a US based testing and certification provider. The authorization allows GLI Europe B.V., operating from the Netherlands, to act as both a testing and certification provider and an inspection body within Ukraine’s regulated gaming market.

According to the announcement, GLI Europe B.V. is currently the only foreign entity authorized to perform these dual functions in the country. This accreditation enables GLI to process product certification requests from suppliers seeking entry into Ukraine’s regulated environment.

GLI operates in more than 710 jurisdictions globally. Through its European hub, the company will apply ISO/IEC standards 17025, 17020, and 17065 when assessing gaming equipment and systems for the Ukrainian market. These standards cover testing laboratories, inspection bodies, and product certification processes, and are intended to ensure that both software and hardware comply with local legal requirements.

Regulatory Reset After Dissolution of KRAIL

The accreditation comes after a significant restructuring of Ukraine’s gambling oversight framework. In early 2025, the previous regulator, KRAIL, was dissolved following high profile corruption scandals and allegations of lingering Russian influence.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy subsequently authorized the creation of PlayCity, a new regulatory body designed to modernize and digitize oversight. PlayCity operates under the Ministry of Digital Transformation and is described as a digital first agency.

The stated objective of the new framework is to move away from paper based supervision toward a real time, data driven regulatory model. By accrediting an internationally active testing laboratory, the Ukrainian authorities are signaling that technical compliance and independent certification will play a central role in the restructured market.

Certification Requirements for Domestic and Foreign Suppliers

Under the updated framework, both domestic and foreign gaming suppliers must obtain a certificate of approval from PlayCity before they can request product certification. This requirement applies to companies providing gaming hardware and software.

GLI will handle product evaluations through GLI Europe B.V., applying the relevant ISO/IEC standards to areas such as random number generators and physical slot cabinets. The process is designed to ensure that gaming products meet Ukrainian legal and technical standards before they are deployed in the market.

James Boje, Managing Director for EMEIA at GLI, stated that the company will bring its global testing expertise to PlayCity and to suppliers seeking access to the Ukrainian market. The accreditation formalizes GLI’s role in supporting compliance checks for regulated operators and suppliers.

For operators and platform providers, certification by an accredited laboratory is a prerequisite for offering approved products. For international suppliers evaluating market entry, the presence of a recognized testing body may clarify procedural requirements and technical benchmarks.

State Online Monitoring System and Digital Oversight

The accreditation coincides with the rollout of Ukraine’s State Online Monitoring System, referred to as SOM. This framework is intended to provide the government with real time visibility into operator systems.

According to the information provided, SOM tracks player activity, fund transfers, and winnings through application programming interfaces. The system is designed to reduce the shadow segment of the market and to support fair taxation.

Alongside technical oversight, Ukraine has introduced legislative updates that revise the industry’s tax structure. The new model moves toward a flat 18% tax on gross gaming revenue. Combined with the implementation of SOM and the accreditation of international laboratories, the changes represent a coordinated restructuring of supervision, certification, and fiscal policy within the sector.

For operators, this means integration with monitoring infrastructure and compliance with updated tax rules. For suppliers, it requires alignment with certification standards verified by accredited bodies such as GLI.

Implications for the Regulated Market Environment

The decision to accredit GLI positions Ukraine within a framework that references internationally recognized testing standards. GLI has recently secured similar first of their kind accreditations in other jurisdictions, including the UK and the Philippines, according to the information provided.

In the Ukrainian context, the move indicates that the government is prioritizing structured certification and inspection processes as part of its regulatory overhaul. For players, this means that gaming software and hardware in the regulated market will be subject to laboratory testing under ISO/IEC standards before approval.

For international operators and suppliers assessing regulatory risk, the combination of centralized digital monitoring, formal laboratory accreditation, and a defined tax rate outlines the core parameters of Ukraine’s current gaming framework.

Our Assessment

Ukraine’s accreditation of GLI as its first international testing and inspection body marks a concrete step in the transition from KRAIL to the newly established PlayCity regulator. The authorization formalizes technical certification procedures under ISO/IEC standards and aligns them with the rollout of the State Online Monitoring System and a revised 18% gross gaming revenue tax model. Together, these measures define the operational, technical, and fiscal structure of Ukraine’s restructured gaming market.

Nepal Orders Immediate Shutdown of Online Betting Platforms – Telecommunications Authority Given 24 Hours to Enforce Ban

Key Takeaways

Government Orders Immediate Closure of Betting Apps and Websites

Nepal has moved to shut down online betting platforms through an official government announcement published online. According to the notice, the Nepal Telecommunications Authority has been instructed to immediately close betting apps and websites, including any form of electronic betting.

Authorities have been given a strict 24 hour deadline to carry out the order. The directive requires coordination between the telecommunications regulator and internet service providers operating in the country. This suggests that enforcement will likely focus on restricting access at the network level.

The wording of the announcement emphasizes urgency. By requiring immediate action within a single day, the government signals that the shutdown is intended to take effect without a transition period for operators or users.

Role of the Nepal Telecommunications Authority and ISPs

The Nepal Telecommunications Authority is expected to implement the directive in cooperation with internet service providers nationwide. While the announcement does not detail technical measures, such coordination typically involves blocking access to specified domains or applications.

The instruction covers betting apps and websites broadly, including electronic betting. The scope indicates that both mobile applications and browser based platforms fall under the order. The announcement does not distinguish between domestic and international operators, nor does it reference specific brands.

For users in Nepal, access to online betting services may be disrupted once internet service providers apply the required restrictions. For operators, the directive signals an immediate halt to online gambling activity within the country’s digital infrastructure.

Political Timing Following Change in Leadership

The shutdown order was issued only days after Balendra Shah was sworn in as prime minister of Nepal on March 27. The 35 year old, described as a former rapper musician and mayor of Kathmandu, became the country’s youngest prime minister following a landslide victory for the Rastriya Swatantra Party.

The proximity between the change in leadership and the regulatory action provides important political context. While the announcement itself does not outline policy motivations, the timing shows that the directive was issued at the start of a new administration.

For observers of regulatory developments, leadership transitions often coincide with shifts in enforcement priorities. In this case, the first days of the new government have included a decisive move against online betting platforms.

Reports of Rising Online Gambling Activity

Pressure to address online gambling had been building prior to the latest order. In November 2025, the Himalayan Times reported a surge of gambling apps and online platforms in Nepal. According to that report, these services were operating freely at the time.

The earlier coverage highlighted growing visibility and availability of gambling platforms in the country. The recent directive can be viewed against this backdrop of increased online betting activity.

Although the government announcement does not reference specific enforcement statistics or investigations, the prior reporting indicates that online gambling had become more prominent in Nepal’s digital landscape in recent months.

Regional Context: India’s Ban on Real Money Gaming

The wider region has also seen regulatory tightening related to online gaming and betting. In August of last year, neighboring India passed a bill to ban online real money gaming, with the ban set to take effect by October 1 of that year.

While Nepal’s announcement does not explicitly link its decision to developments in India, the timing shows that regulatory scrutiny of online gaming and betting platforms is not limited to a single jurisdiction in South Asia.

For international operators and users who follow regulatory shifts across borders, regional developments can affect market access and compliance requirements. The recent action in Nepal adds to a pattern of stricter oversight in parts of the region.

Implications for Users and Operators

The government’s 24 hour deadline leaves little room for adjustment. Operators serving users in Nepal face an immediate interruption of service if access is blocked by internet service providers. The directive does not describe penalties, but it clearly mandates closure of access to betting apps and websites.

For users, the order may result in sudden inaccessibility of platforms that were previously available. The announcement does not outline transitional measures or exceptions.

Because the directive refers broadly to betting apps, websites, and electronic betting, its scope appears comprehensive in terms of online formats.

Our Assessment

Nepal has formally instructed its telecommunications regulator to shut down online betting platforms within 24 hours, marking a rapid enforcement action at the start of a new government’s term. The move follows earlier reports of increasing gambling app activity in the country and occurs amid wider regional regulatory tightening. For operators and users, the key development is the immediate and nationwide nature of the ordered shutdown, implemented through coordination with internet service providers.

Walmart-Backed OnePay Expands Crypto Listings – Fintech App Targets New-to-Crypto Users With Broader Token Selection

Key Takeaways

OnePay Broadens Its Crypto Offering Beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum

OnePay, a fintech company majority-owned by Walmart, has expanded its cryptocurrency offering by listing more than a dozen additional digital assets. The move comes just months after the company launched its crypto platform in January with support for Bitcoin and Ethereum.

According to statements from Ron Rojany, OnePay’s general manager for Core App and Crypto, the latest additions include SUI, Polygon and Arbitrum. These listings follow another recent batch of 10 tokens, among them Solana, Cardano, Bitcoin Cash and PAX Gold.

The expansion significantly increases the number of digital assets available within the OnePay app. While the company has not disclosed specific user numbers or trading volumes, it describes engagement as strong, particularly among customers who are new to cryptocurrency and seeking an integrated entry point.

Selection Criteria Focus on Demand, Liquidity and Regulatory Clarity

OnePay states that it applies defined criteria when deciding which tokens to list. According to Rojany, the company prioritizes assets that meet what he describes as a high bar in four areas: customer demand, liquidity, regulatory clarity and long-term utility.

This approach suggests that the company aims to balance user interest with operational and compliance considerations. Rather than adding newly launched or trending assets, OnePay says it is curating a set of tokens that align with how its customers use and manage their money.

The emphasis on regulatory clarity is notable in the context of US digital asset oversight. While OnePay did not provide details on its compliance framework, its stated focus indicates that legal considerations play a role in listing decisions.

Superapp Strategy Integrates Banking, Payments and Crypto

OnePay positions itself as a US-based superapp, modeled in concept on China’s WeChat. The company aims to combine multiple financial services within a single mobile platform.

Beyond crypto trading, the app offers traditional financial products, including high-yield savings accounts, debit and credit cards, loans and wireless plans. It also provides a digital wallet that customers can use for payments at Walmart stores and through Walmart’s online platform.

Walmart’s US operations reported net sales of 462.4 billion dollars in fiscal 2025, according to the company’s most recent annual report. The retail scale of Walmart’s operations provides distribution potential for financial services integrated into the broader shopping ecosystem.

By adding crypto functionality to an existing financial app, OnePay is not launching a standalone exchange. Instead, it embeds digital asset access within a broader banking and payments environment.

Growing Interest in Multi-Service Financial Platforms

OnePay is not the only company pursuing a multi-service financial model that includes digital assets. In September, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong outlined plans to develop a crypto-focused superapp offering services such as credit cards, payments and Bitcoin rewards.

Similarly, Japan’s Startale Group announced earlier this month that it would use funds from a 50 million dollar Series A round to build a superapp integrating payments, asset management and onchain services into one platform.

Regulatory developments in the United States may also influence this trend. US Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins expressed support in September for platforms operating under a unified regulatory framework that could allow trading, lending and staking of digital assets within a single structure. In July, he directed Commission staff to develop further guidance and proposals to advance what he described as a superapp vision.

While OnePay has not publicly detailed how its crypto services align with potential future regulatory frameworks, the broader policy discussion indicates that integrated digital asset platforms are under active consideration by regulators.

Relevance for Users Evaluating Crypto-Enabled Financial Apps

For users comparing crypto-enabled financial services, OnePay’s expansion increases the range of assets accessible within a single retail-linked application. The inclusion of networks such as Polygon, Arbitrum and Solana introduces exposure to multiple blockchain ecosystems beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum.

The addition of assets like PAX Gold also extends the offering to tokenized products linked to physical commodities. At the same time, the company emphasizes that it is curating its listings rather than aiming for maximum token count.

Because OnePay integrates crypto into a broader payments and banking environment, users access digital assets alongside traditional financial tools. This structure differs from platforms focused exclusively on trading and may appeal to individuals seeking consolidated account management.

Our Assessment

OnePay has expanded its crypto platform from an initial Bitcoin and Ethereum offering to include more than a dozen additional tokens, citing demand, liquidity, regulatory clarity and long-term utility as selection criteria. The move forms part of a broader strategy to position the app as a US superapp combining banking, payments and digital assets. Within a competitive environment where other firms are also developing integrated financial platforms, OnePay’s expansion increases the scope of crypto assets available to its customer base while maintaining a stated focus on curated listings.

Morgan Stanley Files 0.14% Bitcoin ETF Fee – New Pricing Sets Lowest Cost Among U.S. Spot Products

Key Takeaways

Morgan Stanley Discloses 0.14% Annual Fee for Bitcoin Trust

Morgan Stanley is preparing to enter the U.S. spot bitcoin ETF market with a fee structure that positions its product as the lowest-cost option at launch. According to updated trust documents referenced by Bloomberg analyst Eric Balchunas, the upcoming Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) will charge an annual management fee of 0.14%.

This rate is 11 basis points below BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), which currently charges around 0.25%. Based on the disclosed figures, MSBT would become the cheapest spot bitcoin ETF available in the United States once it begins trading.

Fee levels are a key differentiator in the ETF market. Lower expense ratios directly reduce the cost of holding an investment product over time. In a segment where multiple funds offer similar exposure to the same underlying asset, pricing can influence asset flows.

Distribution Power Within Morgan Stanley’s Wealth Network

Morgan Stanley’s entry carries particular relevance because of its distribution capabilities. The bank oversees approximately $8 trillion in wealth management assets and works with thousands of financial advisors.

According to the information provided, fee sensitivity has been one factor limiting broader adoption of spot bitcoin ETFs within advisory channels. Advisors who allocate client capital often consider cost structures when selecting products. By offering a lower-cost in-house vehicle, Morgan Stanley could reduce internal barriers tied to recommending higher-fee third-party funds.

Phong Le, CEO of Strategy, described the ETF as a potential large-scale catalyst, estimating that even a 2% allocation across Morgan Stanley’s platform could translate into roughly $160 billion in demand. While this figure represents an estimate rather than a confirmed allocation, it illustrates how distribution scale can influence potential capital flows in the ETF market.

Regulatory Status and Listing Progress

The Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust has already received a listing notice from the New York Stock Exchange. A listing notice is generally viewed as a procedural step indicating that trading could begin once final regulatory clearance is granted.

If approved, MSBT would become the first spot bitcoin ETF issued directly by a major U.S. bank rather than by a traditional asset management firm. Existing spot bitcoin ETFs in the United States have been launched by asset managers since the category debuted in 2024.

The timing of the launch depends on the completion of remaining regulatory steps. No exact trading date has been confirmed in the provided information.

Fund Structure and Service Providers

Structurally, MSBT will follow the same model used by other U.S.-listed spot bitcoin ETFs. The trust will hold bitcoin directly rather than using derivatives or synthetic exposure.

Coinbase will serve as custodian and prime broker. In this role, Coinbase is responsible for safeguarding the bitcoin held by the trust and facilitating related transactions. BNY Mellon will provide fund administration, transfer agency services, and cash custody.

This structure mirrors the operational framework already established in the U.S. spot bitcoin ETF market, where third-party custodians and administrators handle asset security and fund operations.

Market Context: Spot Bitcoin ETFs Since 2024

Since their launch in 2024, U.S.-listed spot bitcoin ETFs have attracted more than $50 billion in inflows. These inflows have been driven largely by retail and self-directed investors, according to the information provided.

Adoption within wealth management platforms has been comparatively slower. Internal policies, cost considerations, and portfolio construction guidelines have influenced how quickly advisors integrate spot bitcoin ETFs into client portfolios.

At the time referenced in the source material, bitcoin was trading near $66,000. Market price levels can affect investor demand for exchange-traded products that provide direct exposure to the asset.

For international users evaluating crypto-related financial products, fee competition among U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs may signal further differentiation in a market where underlying exposure is largely standardized. Lower management fees reduce holding costs, which can be relevant when comparing long-term access routes to bitcoin through regulated investment vehicles.

Our Assessment

Morgan Stanley’s planned 0.14% fee for the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust sets a new low-cost benchmark in the U.S. spot bitcoin ETF market based on the figures disclosed. The combination of a reduced expense ratio and access to Morgan Stanley’s $8 trillion wealth management network distinguishes the product from existing offerings. The fund has received a New York Stock Exchange listing notice and is awaiting final regulatory clearance, with Coinbase and BNY Mellon designated as key service providers. Since U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs have already attracted more than $50 billion in inflows since 2024, the entry of a major U.S. bank with a lower-cost structure represents a measurable development within this segment of the crypto investment market.

Ripple CEO Says Stablecoins Are Crypto’s ‘ChatGPT Moment’ – Corporate Adoption and Regulatory Clarity in Focus

Key Takeaways

Ripple CEO Positions Stablecoins as Entry Point for Corporate Blockchain Adoption

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said stablecoins could serve as a decisive turning point for business adoption of crypto-based payments. Speaking to FOX Business, he described stablecoins as the industry’s “ChatGPT moment” for companies looking for faster and more efficient ways to move money.

According to Garlinghouse, corporate leadership is increasingly focused on the topic. He said boards of directors and chief executives at Fortune 500 and Fortune 2000 companies are asking their treasury departments and chief financial officers how they plan to approach stablecoins. In his view, providing treasurers and CFOs with the option to use stablecoins represents a key unlock for broader blockchain integration.

Garlinghouse linked this development to a broader shift in how businesses evaluate financial infrastructure. He said stablecoins could act as an entry point, allowing companies to access additional blockchain-based services once they begin using tokenized dollars for payments and treasury operations.

Stablecoin Trading Volume Reaches $33 Trillion in 2025

Garlinghouse noted that stablecoins processed more than $33 trillion in trading volume in 2025. This figure underscores the scale that dollar-pegged digital assets have already reached within the crypto ecosystem.

However, market concentration remains significant. Nearly 90% of that volume was attributed to two issuers: Tether’s USDt (USDT) and Circle’s USDC. These two stablecoins continue to dominate trading activity, liquidity, and settlement flows across crypto markets.

For users of crypto betting platforms, sportsbooks, and online casinos, this concentration is relevant. Many platforms rely on USDT or USDC as primary settlement currencies due to their liquidity and price stability relative to fiat currencies. High trading volumes can support tighter spreads and faster transfers, which directly affect transaction efficiency and user experience.

Bloomberg Projects $56.6 Trillion in Stablecoin Flows by 2030

Bloomberg Intelligence predicted in early January that stablecoin flows could reach $56.6 trillion by 2030. The projection assumes a compounded annual growth rate of 80% over the coming years.

If realized, this level of transaction flow would position stablecoins among the most significant payment instruments in global finance. The projection reflects expectations that stablecoins could expand beyond crypto trading and into broader corporate and cross-border payment use cases.

For international users and operators, projected growth in stablecoin flows signals potential changes in liquidity conditions and infrastructure development. Payment providers, exchanges, and gaming platforms may adjust their offerings depending on how corporate adoption and regulatory frameworks evolve.

Ripple Expands Infrastructure and Launches RLUSD Stablecoin

Ripple entered the stablecoin market in December 2024 with the launch of Ripple USD (RLUSD). According to CoinGecko data cited in the report, RLUSD is currently the 10th largest stablecoin by market capitalization, with a value of $1.4 billion.

The launch of RLUSD adds a competitor to a market still largely dominated by USDT and USDC. While its market share remains smaller compared to the leading issuers, RLUSD represents Ripple’s direct participation in the stablecoin segment it views as strategically important for business payments.

In parallel, Ripple strengthened its broader blockchain payments infrastructure through two major acquisitions. The company acquired institutional prime brokerage Hidden Road for $1.25 billion and corporate treasury platform GTreasury for $1 billion. Garlinghouse said Ripple is set to have a record quarter and described the company as being “on a tear” since completing these acquisitions.

These transactions expand Ripple’s footprint in institutional services and treasury management, areas closely linked to the corporate use cases Garlinghouse highlighted in relation to stablecoins.

Regulatory Clarity and the Role of the CLARITY Act

Garlinghouse also addressed the regulatory environment in the United States. He said that stablecoin payments and broader blockchain adoption would be accelerated if the CLARITY Act were to pass Congress and be signed into law.

He emphasized that market participants are closely watching how US crypto regulation develops. According to Garlinghouse, regulatory certainty is essential to avoid what he described as a previous period in which policy was used in a politicized manner rather than focused on national economic interests.

For crypto users and international operators, US market structure legislation can influence access to dollar-backed stablecoins, compliance standards, and the willingness of financial institutions to integrate blockchain-based payment solutions.

Our Assessment

Stablecoins processed more than $33 trillion in 2025, with USDT and USDC accounting for the majority of activity. Bloomberg Intelligence projects that flows could reach $56.6 trillion by 2030. Ripple has positioned itself within this segment through the launch of RLUSD and acquisitions aimed at strengthening institutional and treasury services. At the same time, the company highlights US regulatory developments, including the proposed CLARITY Act, as a key factor in shaping further adoption by corporations and financial institutions.

BetMGM to Ban Credit Card Funding for Online Gambling Accounts – Payment Policy Shift Affects Sports and Casino Users

Key Takeaways

BetMGM to End Credit Card Deposits for Online Sports and Casino Betting

BetMGM plans to stop accepting credit cards as a method for funding player accounts used for online wagering. The change applies to customers who deposit funds for online sports betting and online casino gaming.

According to the reported information, the operator will no longer allow credit card transactions for these activities. The move affects how users transfer money into their accounts before placing wagers or participating in online casino games.

The decision positions BetMGM among the operators that have introduced similar restrictions on credit card use for gambling-related payments. The company operates as a joint venture between MGM Resorts and Entain, combining land-based casino experience with digital betting operations.

Scope of the Policy Change

The announced restriction specifically concerns the funding of player accounts through credit cards. This means customers will not be able to use credit-issued payment cards to deposit funds intended for online sports wagering or online casino gaming.

The information provided does not outline alternative payment methods or specify an exact implementation timeline. However, the core element of the change is clear: credit cards will no longer be accepted for account deposits linked to online gambling activities under the BetMGM brand.

For users, account funding methods are a central part of the betting process. Deposits typically precede any wagering activity, whether on sports events or casino games. A change in accepted payment methods can therefore directly affect how customers manage their betting budgets and transaction processes.

BetMGM Within the Broader Operator Landscape

The report describes BetMGM as the latest gambling operator to implement a credit card funding ban. This indicates that similar measures have been taken elsewhere in the industry, although no further details are provided in the available information.

As a joint venture between MGM Resorts and Entain, BetMGM represents a collaboration between an established land-based casino operator and a global gambling technology and services company. Policy adjustments at this level are relevant for a broad user base, particularly those who engage in regulated online sports betting and casino gaming.

Payment policies are a key operational component for any online gambling platform. They define which financial channels customers can use and can influence user behavior, transaction costs, and payment processing structures. In this case, the removal of credit card deposits marks a clear shift in one of the most widely recognized payment categories.

Implications for Online Gambling Customers

For customers who have previously relied on credit cards to fund their BetMGM accounts, the announced change will require an adjustment. Once the ban takes effect, these users will need to use alternative payment options to continue depositing funds for online betting or casino play.

The available information does not detail how many customers currently use credit cards for deposits, nor does it specify how the transition will be communicated operationally. What is confirmed is that credit card funding for online wagering will no longer be permitted under BetMGM’s updated policy.

In practical terms, account funding is the first step in participating in online gambling. Restrictions on specific payment methods can therefore affect accessibility and user experience. Customers typically evaluate platforms not only on odds or game selection, but also on deposit and withdrawal processes. Any change to accepted payment methods is therefore operationally significant.

Industry Attention on Payment Controls

Although the information provided focuses solely on BetMGM, the reference to the operator as the latest to impose a credit card ban highlights an observable pattern within the gambling sector. Payment method restrictions have become a subject of operational and regulatory attention in various markets.

Within online gambling, payment controls often intersect with compliance standards, responsible gambling measures, and financial processing policies. The decision by a major joint venture such as BetMGM to remove credit card funding from its accepted methods underscores the relevance of payment structures in digital wagering environments.

For international users who compare betting platforms, payment method availability is frequently a deciding factor. A change of this nature may influence how certain users evaluate their options, particularly if they prioritize specific funding channels.

Our Assessment

BetMGM’s decision to prohibit credit card funding for online sports betting and online casino accounts represents a concrete operational change in its payment policy. The measure applies across its digital wagering products and aligns the operator with others that have introduced similar restrictions. For users, the development directly affects how accounts can be funded, making payment method review an essential step before placing wagers on the platform.