1xBet Study Highlights Low Use of Responsible Gambling Tools

Marcel Fuhrmann
/ 5 min read

1xBet Study Finds Only 20% of Players Use Responsible Gambling Tools – Education Emerges as Central Industry Focus

Key Takeaways

  • Only 20% of players use responsible gambling tools offered by operators, according to the Player Protection Index Series.
  • 85.7% of operators say they are willing to take on greater responsibility for safer gambling, and 96% see regulator cooperation as essential.
  • Deposit limits are the most widely used tool, adopted by 89.2% of operators surveyed.
  • 84% of respondents consider player education the foundation of safer gambling, yet only 14% rate their current educational efforts as highly effective.

Industry Study Highlights Gap Between Tools and Usage

The global betting company 1xBet has published findings from its Player Protection Index Series, a study examining how operators approach responsible gambling and how players engage with available safeguards. The results indicate a significant gap between the tools offered by platforms and their actual use by players.

According to the study, only 20% of players actively use responsible gambling tools developed by operators. These tools include deposit limits, self exclusion mechanisms, and self assessment questionnaires. The findings suggest that low usage is not primarily linked to technical shortcomings, but to how such measures are perceived by players.

As online gambling has evolved over the past two decades into a complex ecosystem, game mechanics and betting options have become more sophisticated. Operators have introduced slots with intricate bonus systems and a wide range of sports betting types. This growing complexity has increased the barrier to understanding products, making user protection a central issue for the industry.

Operators Signal Willingness to Take Greater Responsibility

The study shows that 85.7% of surveyed operators are prepared to assume more responsibility in organizing safe gambling environments. In addition, 96% of respondents believe that close cooperation with regulators is necessary to achieve meaningful progress in player protection.

At the same time, 71% of operators say that players should also take responsibility for their own gambling behavior. This reflects a shared responsibility model, in which both platforms and users are expected to contribute to safer outcomes.

However, only 14% of respondents consider their current educational and awareness initiatives to be highly effective. This indicates that while many operators acknowledge the importance of player education, they see substantial room for improvement in execution and impact.

Perception Barriers Limit Effectiveness of Responsible Gambling Measures

The report identifies several reasons why existing tools are underused. Players in at risk categories often do not believe they need counseling support, self exclusion options, or other forms of assistance. Responsible gambling notifications are frequently perceived as restrictions rather than as mechanisms that expand user control.

Communication format also plays a role. Many users reportedly treat responsible gambling messages as advertising or spam, particularly when notifications appear at inappropriate moments during gameplay.

Operators themselves point to structural challenges. 67.6% of respondents cite a lack of player interest as the main barrier to advancing education initiatives. Meanwhile, 48.7% highlight commercial pressures that make sustained investment in educational programs difficult. Regulatory constraints are mentioned by 29.7% of operators, and 27% refer to general industry apathy as an obstacle.

Deposit Limits Lead Adoption, Self Exclusion Seen as Effective

Among specific tools, deposit limits are the most widely implemented measure. According to the study, 89.2% of operators use deposit limits as part of their responsible gambling framework. Self exclusion schemes are considered the most effective response when risk patterns in player behavior are detected, with 48.7% of respondents confirming their use.

Self assessment questionnaires receive a more cautious evaluation. 38% of operators state that such questionnaires rarely make a difference in influencing player behavior.

In addition, 70% of operators believe that players who follow safe betting principles tend to perform better over the long term. This suggests that many platforms see responsible gambling not only as a compliance requirement but as a factor linked to sustainable engagement.

Personalization and Real Time Interventions Gain Attention

The study points to a shift toward more personalized and integrated approaches. 60% of operators agree that player education is a key element of safe betting, and 84% consider it the foundation of safer gambling practices.

Operators in different regions are testing varied methods. In Africa, some companies reportedly contact players directly in real time after significant wins. In Latin America, operators increasingly rely on artificial intelligence to identify behavioral risk patterns more effectively.

The report also emphasizes the need to integrate educational elements into the full product journey, from onboarding to ongoing gameplay. This includes moving away from static fine print toward in game prompts and clearer explanations of gambling terminology such as RTP and RNG in markets where understanding may be limited.

Standardization of terminology and tools is identified as another priority. The findings indicate that consistent frameworks across operators and regulators could support more coherent implementation.

Our Assessment

The Player Protection Index Series highlights a measurable gap between the availability of responsible gambling tools and their actual use by players. While most operators report widespread adoption of measures such as deposit limits and express readiness to cooperate with regulators, they also acknowledge that current educational efforts have limited effectiveness.

For users of crypto betting platforms, sportsbooks, and online casinos, the findings underline that protective tools are commonly available but often depend on active engagement. The study frames player education, personalization, and closer regulatory collaboration as central elements in the industry’s ongoing efforts to strengthen safer gambling frameworks.